စာကြောင်း ၁၁၇ -
:First of all, I would like to deny access from all Unicode 4.1 fonts. That's why I didn't add "MyMyanmar" font which was also released for 4.1. "MyMyanmar Unicode" is pure Unicode 5.1. { Myanmar3, Parabaik, MyMyanmar, Anawratha, Paduak } will make Michael, all Mac users hang or crach their browsers as Myanmar3's OT tables cannot be translated to ATT at Mac OS. And will render unreadable texts in Linux too. We should focus or readability, that's what CSS and Fonts are designed for. And having Anawrahta at the front-most and you can still use Wikipedia which is fall-backed to second font is completely harmless and un-noticeable for users. Yes MyMyanmar (not font) have a software called "Transcode" which can search-and-fix such wrong sequence errors. Fonts should be for rendering in my opinion. There's probability but it's unlikely that someone could accidentally type MyMyanmar with another input method as I don't release separate font. [[User:MyMyanmar|MyMyanmar]] 11:40, 10 ဇူ​လိုင်​ 2008 (UTC)
::I think you miss read, I have said that it should be fine for Anawrahta to come before Paduak. This would solve you Mac crashing problem too. Currently you have Myanamar3 after, Myanamar2. Is there a specific reason for this? Because the way I see it Myanmar3 has improvements over Myanmar2 hence it would be desirable for users with both fonts on their system to get Myanmar Wikipedia rendered using Myanmar3. Also as of current Parabaik is not present. What I want to see is, as I have mentioned very early on, is a highly inclusive community here. Hence if any normal user with Parabaik on their systems visited Myanmar Wikipedia, they should at the minimum be able to read it without the need to set default fonts etc. We are aiming for maximum impact. Any Joe User with any Unicode 5.1 complaint font should be able to enjoy all the great contributions you and so many others have made here. And on top of that the ordering should be optimal. But first we aim of inclusiveness, than move forward to get an optimal sorting of the current font list. What is optimal will depend on slight differences in the way each font behaves. I note that we had a lot of readers writing about garbled fonts, most likely that had ZawGyi on their systems. But supposing they had Myanmar3 or Parabaik, than they should have been able to enjoy. So the only font left for inclusiveness would be Parabaik. After that we can workout the ordering to benefit the users most (Windows, Mac, and Linux) --[[User:ကိုရာဝီ|ကိုရာဝီ]] 15:14, 10 ဇူ​လိုင်​ 2008 (UTC)
::Your text is a bit confusing. If you are asking me to add Parabaik in the sorted list of CSS, I'll try to evaluate it and add that. But you mean otherwise, please say it in more precise and direct meaning. And what is the difference between Parabaik and Myanmar3 by the way? :) [[User:MyMyanmar|MyMyanmar]] 19:56, 11 ဇူ​လိုင်​ 2008 (UTC)